AP Passage 2000; The Spectator; Addision



Aubrey Sonnenschein

Mr. Schwager

AP English Literature 405

11 March 2014
Surprisingly Satirical

            In his excerpt from the satirical piece, The Spectator, Joseph Addison uses various devices to portray his daily routine. His use of laconic, hourly updates helps to convey his point cogently and understandably. The repetition in the passage accurately symbolizes a sort of stagnation and repetitive occurrences in his daily life. It’s evident that the tone of his writing and of the character that he’s created is similar to the tone he propagates as he goes through his own life’s motions. By elaborating on life’s inertia but also the possibilities of it taking a sudden turn out of monotony, Addison makes himself relatable to others who suffer the same common, persistent struggles. He uses repetition of key events and elaborate detail shifts to unveil a satirical account of life’s ups, downs and middle ground.

            One obvious form of repetition lies in the grouping of words. Addison positions ten and eleven or even, ten, eleven and twelve o’clock together to portray the similarities in those hours from day to day. Beyond grouping, there are words that assure a pattern of stagnation in the character’s life, such as “Nap as usual” and “Dined as usual.”  Furthermore, the behaviors of smoking pipes, drinking, etc., are formed into a sequence. While there are certain disparities between his days like purchasing something new or meeting with a friend, these changes all revolve around an established pattern. Their differences lie in the fact that they’re deviating from the norm. But in everyone’s life, there are a few things that shake routines in insurmountable ways.
            The attention to detail somewhat shifts after news of the Grand Vizier’s death surfaces. The transition to apathy is so clear that it’s nearly palpable. Suddenly, most of the diary entries are centralized around Vizier and what could have happened if he hadn’t died. Addison’s phrasing and meter change from abbreviated snippets to more complete exposition. Rather than the previous curt and choppy, yet succinct diary entries, he begins to expound on his thoughts and employ more full, robust thoughts, rather than terse glimpses. What might have been, “No annuity from Sir Timothy,” prior to the Vizier’s death has blossomed into, “Stayed within till two o’clock for Sir Timothy; who did not bring me my annuity according to his promise” (l. 55-57). All the while, death pervades the last section of the passage, satire is still maintained by virtue of the piece’s layout. It’s ingenious how he is able to deftly present the appearance that a character is nonchalant, yet gain the reader’s sympathy by exhibiting a genuine change of heart. Elusive emotional hints such as, “Could not take my nap” (l. 60) afford the reader with a sort of inevitable compassion. The detail of this piece thoroughly qualifies it as the satire and true depiction of reality that it is.
            Both repetition and detail coincide to create a complex, but comprehensible and satirical piece. It exemplifies certain aspects of life that nearly everyone faces at one time or another and provides an atypical approach on how to handle such things. It seems as though Addison had a firm grip on his intentions for The Spectator. The subtle, skillful use of satire can profoundly alter a reader’s experience, particularly as it contrasts with somber overtones or subtext.

No comments:

Post a Comment